Suspensions and the Obviation of Democratically Elected Local Government Councils in Nigeria
Democratic representation of citizens is a core principle of Nigerian constitutional framework. Despite the stipulation and decision law validating the principle with respect to local governance, state governments have breached it by way of dissolution of democratically elected local government councils before the end of tenure for which the councils were elected and for self-serving purposes. While the courts have long and consistently outlawed the dissolution of local government councils, an escapist means to achieve that is by suspending them as an accountability mechanism in the exercise of the superintending rights of State governments over local government councils. Suspensions of local government councils have had the same effect as dissolution by disrupting democratically elected local government councils, despite pretentions to the contrary. By employing the doctrinal approach, the paper argues that the overarching purpose of the constitutional principle of having democratically elected local government councils should be employed and the imperative to discard the pliant attitude of legislative endorsement of suspensions of local government councils. The continuing suspension of democratic governments at local levels and the effects on democracy and constitutionalism requires greater scrutiny. Although recent judicial attitude on the issue decries suspensions, which is commendable, there is need for compliance in order to give full effect to the intentions of the framers of the Constitution.